Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna: 3-Way Nutrition Comparison
Three-way nutrition comparison: Shrimp, Salmon, and Tuna. Protein, fat, calories, radar chart, and goal amounts. USDA data.
Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna: 3-Way Nutrition Comparison
Three-Way Nutrition Verdict
Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna — Macros per 100g
Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna: Who Wins Each Category?
Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna — Nutrition Radar
Nutrient Density per Calorie: Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna
How Much to Eat to Hit Your Goal
Diet Compatibility: Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna
Shrimp Benefit Signals
- Lean protein: Provides 20.3 g protein per 100 g. Basis: protein >= 20 g per 100 g.
- Low-carb base: Low carbohydrate level can fit low-carb meal planning. Basis: carbs <= 5 g per 100 g.
Shrimp Condition-Aware Nutrition Notes
Shrimp vs Salmon vs Tuna — FAQs
Shrimp, Salmon, and Tuna: A Full Nutrition Comparison
Shrimp Page Quality Signals
Data Sources & Methodology
Data source: USDA FoodData Central. Referenced entries: Salmon, Atlantic, raw (FDC ID: 175167), Tuna, canned in water (FDC ID: 171986).
Three-way comparison method: All three foods are evaluated against the same per-100g baseline. Ranking within each macro is determined by descending order of the macro value. Radar chart axes are normalized to the maximum value across the three foods for visual comparison.
Accuracy note: Macro values represent averages across measured samples; individual items may vary ±5–10% depending on brand, farming method, and preparation technique. For clinical nutrition, consult a registered dietitian.
Update policy: Macro values are reviewed quarterly against USDA FoodData Central updates. Page last verified: 2026.